Re: [ipvs] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
From: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2007-05-28 09:36:51
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:22:40AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:30:52AM +0000, Sebastien Estienne wrote:quoted
I didn't try 2.6.21 yet, but using ubuntu dapper kernel (2.6.15) i can't reproduce the bug. When i was using feisty kernel (2.6.20), i can reproduce in less than 5 minutes. I'm using lvs to loadbalance some mysql servers, i wrote a deamon that check the synchro of the mysql replication on each slave and adjust the wieght on the lvs every 500msIt does look a lot like there is some sort of locking problem in there. Would it be possible to send your kernel config, as the locking deatails to change a little with different configs.
If you also have some details of you ipvs configuration,
that might help narrow down which code-paths to investigate.
I spent some time this afternoon looking into this probem,
and what I think is happening is:
1. Due to your weight-update operations, one processor
is sitting in ip_vs_edit_dest() called by do_ip_vs_set_ctl(),
holding write_lock_bh(&__ip_vs_svc_lock) and waiting
for svc->usecnt to go down to 1.
2. Another process is trying to grab
read_lock(&__ip_vs_svc_lock) in ip_vs_service_get(),
called from tcp_conn_schedule() and in turn ip_vs_in().
I guess that for some reason svc->usecnt isn't going down to 0.
Though I haven't been able to isolate anything particularly
interesting.
That said, the locking isn't that simple, IMHO, so there seems
to be quite a lot of scope for errors.
Some things that are of minor insterst are:
I.
ip_vs_edit_dest() loops with the following construct:
while (atomic_read(&svc->usecnt) > 1) {};
whereas similar code in the same file uses
IP_VS_WAIT_WHILE(atomic_read(&svc->usecnt) > 1);
which expands to
while (atomic_read(&svc->usecnt) > 1) { cpu_relax(); }
But I dount this is a problem, except for burning the cpu a bit harder
than it needs to.
II.
ip_vs_set_ctl() does seem to leak svc->usecnt in one corner case,
but I doubt that is what you are seeing - if it was your ipvsadm
command(s) would hang. The problem is a bit wordy to describe,
but this fix should illustrate the problem.
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c
+++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c@@ -2000,7 +2000,7 @@ do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cm if (cmd != IP_VS_SO_SET_ADD && (svc == NULL || svc->protocol != usvc->protocol)) { ret = -ESRCH; - goto out_unlock; + goto out_svc; } switch (cmd) {
@@ -2034,9 +2034,9 @@ do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cm ret = -EINVAL; } + out_svc: if (svc) ip_vs_service_put(svc); - out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&__ip_vs_mutex); out_dec:
III. Perhaps if you are calling ipvsadm a lot then there is a remote possibility that write_lock_bh() could starve read_lock(). This seems ludicrous, but I'm just mentioning it as it crossed my mind. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/