Re: Subject: [PATCH 2.6.20 004/005] dmfe: Add support for suspend/resume
From: Maxim <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date: 2007-02-18 13:44:00
Also in:
lkml
On Sunday 18 February 2007 00:52:15 Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!quoted
Hello , I am sorry that I missed some parts of coding style. I need to reread it :-) There is a updated patch :It looks better.quoted
+ /* Disable Interrupt */ + outl (0, dev->base_addr + DCR7); + outl (inl(dev->base_addr + DCR5), dev->base_addr + DCR5);I'd kill space after outl...quoted
+ /* Free RX buffers */ + dmfe_free_rxbuffer(db); + + /* Power down device*/and add space before */. Congratulation, you passed coding-style-police-check ;-). Pavel
Hello, Thanks for reply, I just want to ask one question: Those patches are now merged in -mm, and I noticed that Andrew Morton after applying them did fix my bad coding style and check for CONFIG_PM=n that I didn't include Now should I resend two last patches or not ? Regards, Maxim Levitsky PS: Actualy I have planned to send those patches a little bit later , and do more checks like the coding style stuff, mailer problems, etc... but I noticed that 2.6.20 breaks link detection on my card, and I even saw report here on LKML about that, so I decided to send them now Of cource I did check them for code correctness , and I actualy used them for about a month. I tried to do as little as possible changes, and verify each line.