Thread (82 messages) 82 messages, 14 authors, 2007-01-27

Re: [PATCH 25/59] sysctl: C99 convert arch/frv/kernel/pm.c

From: Herbert Poetzl <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-22 22:21:22
Also in: linux-mips, linux-scsi, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:14:17PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
another small minor note.
quoted
From: Eric W. Biederman <redacted> - unquoted

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <redacted>
---
 arch/frv/kernel/pm.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/pm.c b/arch/frv/kernel/pm.c
index c1840d6..aa50333 100644
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/pm.c
+++ b/arch/frv/kernel/pm.c
@@ -401,17 +401,53 @@ static int cm_sysctl(ctl_table *table, int __user *name, int nlen,
 
 static struct ctl_table pm_table[] =
 {
-	{CTL_PM_SUSPEND, "suspend", NULL, 0, 0200, NULL, &sysctl_pm_do_suspend},
-	{CTL_PM_CMODE, "cmode", &clock_cmode_current, sizeof(int), 0644, NULL, &cmode_procctl, &cmode_sysctl, NULL},
-	{CTL_PM_P0, "p0", &clock_p0_current, sizeof(int), 0644, NULL, &p0_procctl, &p0_sysctl, NULL},
-	{CTL_PM_CM, "cm", &clock_cm_current, sizeof(int), 0644, NULL, &cm_procctl, &cm_sysctl, NULL},
-	{0}
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_PM_SUSPEND,
+		.procname	= "suspend",
+		.data		= NULL,
+		.maxlen		= 0,
+		.mode		= 0200,
+		.proc_handler	= &sysctl_pm_do_suspend,
+	},
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_PM_CMODE,
+		.procname	= "cmode",
+		.data		= &clock_cmode_current,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= &cmode_procctl,
+		.strategy	= &cmode_sysctl,
+	},
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_PM_P0,
+		.procname	= "p0",
+		.data		= &clock_p0_current,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= &p0_procctl,
+		.strategy	= &p0_sysctl,
+	},
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_PM_CM,
+		.procname	= "cm",
+		.data		= &clock_cm_current,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= &cm_procctl,
+		.strategy	= &cm_sysctl,
+	},
+	{ .ctl_name = 0}
in next patch (26/59) you write just "{ }". .ctl_name = 0 not required here.
I'd prefer '{ 0 }' here, but I'm fine with the '{ .ctl_name = 0 }'
too, just '{ }' seems confusing, and it actually might get
misinterpreted too ..

best,
Herbert
quoted
 };
 
 static struct ctl_table pm_dir_table[] =
 {
-	{CTL_PM, "pm", NULL, 0, 0555, pm_table},
-	{0}
+	{
+		.ctl_name	= CTL_PM,
+		.procname	= "pm",
+		.mode		= 0555,
+		.child		= pm_table,
+	},
+	{ .ctl_name = 0}
 };
 
 /*
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help