Re: [RFC] Alternative hidden netwirk device interface
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-31 18:44:21
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2007-01-31 18:44:21
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:26:47 +0100 Jiri Benc [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:09:58 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:quoted
Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name. If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't show up in /sys or /procWhat about things like neigh_sysctl_register which expects nonempty dev name or rtnetlink_event which sends a RTM_NEWLINK event (I doubt that listeners are prepared for nonempty dev name)?
that is fixable.
Also, if the interface has ifindex assigned it is accessible from user space (although it's unlikely anybody would call anything on it) - what should be the correct result of e.g. SIOCGIFNAME?
blank?
Thanks, Jiri
-- Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]