Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
From: Benny Amorsen <hidden>
Date: 2006-12-20 20:40:53
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2006-12-22 · Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down · Matt Domsch <hidden>
- 2006-12-21 · Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down · <hidden>
- 2006-12-21 · Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down · David Brownell <hidden>
- 2006-12-21 · Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
- 2006-12-21 · Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down · David Brownell <hidden>
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"AvdV" == Arjan van de Ven [off-list ref] writes:
AvdV> even if you have NO power savings you still don't meet your AvdV> criteria. That's basic ethernet for you.... AvdV> That's what I was trying to say; your criteria is unrealistic AvdV> regardless of what the kernel does, ethernet already dictates 30 AvdV> to 45 seconds there. Can you get to such high numbers without STP? /Benny