Re: [PATCH] r8169: use the broken_parity_status field in pci_dev

[PATCH] r8169: use the broken_parity_status field in pci_dev · Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> · 2006-12-17
Re: [PATCH] r8169: use the broken_parity_status field in pci_dev · Lennert Buytenhek <hidden> · 2006-12-18
Re: [PATCH] r8169: use the broken_parity_status field in pci_dev · Jeff Garzik <hidden> · 2006-12-26

From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2006-12-26 21:24:31

Francois Romieu wrote:

The former option is removed and platform code can now specify the
expected behavior.

Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>

applied

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help