Re: [Devel] Re: Network virtualization/isolation
From: Tomasz Torcz <hidden>
Date: 2006-12-09 11:27:45
Attachments
- (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 229 bytes
From: Tomasz Torcz <hidden>
Date: 2006-12-09 11:27:45
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 04:50:02AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:57:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:quoted
Herbert Poetzl [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
But, ok, it is not the real point to argue so much imho and waste our time instead of doing things.quoted
quoted
well, IMHO better talk (and think) first, then implement something ... not the other way round, and then start fixing up the mess ...Well we need a bit of both.hmm, are 'we' in a hurry here? until recently, 'Linux' (mainline) didn't even want to hear about OS Level virtualization, now there is a rush to quickly get 'something' in, not knowing or caring if it is usable at all?
Maybe beacuse other Operating Systems have it? For example Solaris' Crossbow... -- Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile. zdzichu@irc.-nie.spam-.pl Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev