Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2006-11-29 04:57:11
Also in:
lkml, netfilter-devel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2006-11-30 · Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function · Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
- 2006-11-29 · Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function · Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
- 2006-11-29 · Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function · Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
- 2006-11-28 · Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function · Patrick McHardy <hidden>
- 2006-11-28 · Re: Broken commit: [NETFILTER]: ipt_REJECT: remove largely duplicate route_reverse function · Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
David Miller [off-list ref] wrote:
Longer term this is really messy, we should handle this some other way.
Definitely. I'm not sure whether 48 is enough even for recursive tunnels. This should really just be a hint. It's OK to spend a bit of time reallocating skb's if it's too small, but it's not OK to die. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt