Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: slab allocation fairness
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-30 20:29:22
Also in:
linux-mm
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2006-11-30 20:29:22
Also in:
linux-mm
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
quoted
Sure, but there is nothing wrong with using a slab page with a lower allocation rank when there is memory aplenty.What does "a slab page with a lower allocation rank" mean? Slab pages have no allocation ranks that I am aware of.I just added allocation rank and didn't you suggest tracking it for all slab pages instead of per slab?
Yes but that is not in place so I was wondering what you were talking about. It would help to have some longer text describing what you intend to do and how rank would work throughout the VM.