On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:45:35PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
On 3/10, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
| > I suggest that you revert the memset() to IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1 so that
| > the last byte is cleared as well. Or am I missing something?
|
| No, that would bring back the slab/memory overflow we are
| trying to get rid of.
Then I am puzzled by the function declaration:
static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1])
Do you mean that this function is called with a buf parameter which
doesn't have the expected size? (as far as the function declaration is
concerned) Shouldn't the declaration be changed to
static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE])
then to reflect the reality? (it won't change the code but would be
clearer from a documentation point of view)
Yep, that one is a bug.
Thanks !
Sam
Jean