Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 7 authors, 2006-10-05

Re: 2.6.18-mm2 - oops in cache_alloc_refill()

From: Jean Tourrilhes <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-03 17:08:26
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:45:35PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
On  3/10, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

| > I suggest that you revert the memset() to IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1 so that
| > the last byte is cleared as well. Or am I missing something?
| 
| No, that would bring back the slab/memory overflow we are
| trying to get rid of.

Then I am puzzled by the function declaration:

static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
                                char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1])

Do you mean that this function is called with a buf parameter which
doesn't have the expected size? (as far as the function declaration is
concerned) Shouldn't the declaration be changed to

static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
                                char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE])

then to reflect the reality? (it won't change the code but would be
clearer from a documentation point of view)
	Yep, that one is a bug.
	Thanks !
 Sam
	Jean
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help