Re: [PATCH 3/3] ep93xx_eth: don't report RX FIFO overrun errors
From: Ray Lehtiniemi <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-29 18:42:09
From: Ray Lehtiniemi <hidden>
Date: 2006-10-29 18:42:09
On Sunday 29 October 2006 11:22, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
quoted
Also, is it possible for any other error bits to be set at the same time as OE? such bits would not be printed to the log in this case.Not sure, but arguably, this wouldn't be very interesting. Actually, now I'm wondering whether we should just remove the printk altogether.
i don't see why we need a printk... the error counters _should_ be sufficient. ray