Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 6 authors, 2006-09-20

Re: [PATCH] Remove powerpc specific parts of 3c509 driver

From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-20 21:29:44
Also in: linuxppc-dev

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Sure, PCI busses are little-endian.  But is readX()/writeX() for PCI
only?
Yes.

For other buses, use foo_writel(), etc.
Can this please be documented then?  Never heard this before...
You have come late to the party.
WHat do you mean here?  Could you please explain?
quoted
This has been the case for many, many years.
No, it was never documented AFAICS.
A de facto standard does not need to be documented, to be a de facto 
standard.

A lot of Linux "standards" are often based on emails from Linus buried 
halfway down a thread.  A decision gets made, and people follow.

quoted
And there is no point in a massive rename to pci_writel(), either.
That would be really inconvenient, sure.  It's also inconvenient
that all the nice short names are PCI-only.
Only to you, a decided minority of developers.

	Jeff


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help