Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 9 authors, 2006-09-28

Re: [PATCH] softmac: Fix WX and association related races

From: Michael Buesch <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-28 15:13:30

On Thursday 28 September 2006 16:52, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:43 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
quoted
On Thursday 28 September 2006 16:37, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 10:19 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
quoted
I'd buy that argument.  When the driver gets the deauth message,
shouldn't it be sending an IWAP 00:00:00:00:00:00 wireless event to
userspace?
I thought we did that since a long time now, didn't you actually develop
the initial patch?
Yes, I think I did.  My point here wasn't that the driver is _not_
sending those messages (it almost certainly is), but what's _implied_ by
those messages.  Namely that, if you're using a tool like wpa_supplicant
and/or NM, when you get a deauth from the AP and send the IWAP event,
all bets are off because the tool will likely override whatever the
driver thinks its doing.

I'm somewhat ambiguous on just how much policy a driver should try to
enforce.  I guess I'm OK with reassociation with the _same_ credentials.
But what airo does with "auto_wep" is very nearly, if not completely,
crossing the line [1].  The real question is, how much should drivers
really do, and how much should they leave to userspace?
IMO a driver should implement absolutely _zero_ policy, as this
is the only way to get the same (default) policy for different
cards. A driver should _only_ provide generic events for
userspace tools to make decisions.
A "I got a deauth" event is really enough for userspace to
know what to do.
As a counterpoint, does every developer _really_ want to run
wpa_supplicant just to use a WEP-encrypted connection where you may
occasionally get kicked off?
I think that's the way we want to take. Even for unencrypted networks,
probably. We want as much as possible of the high level MAC
implementation in userspace. Remember the summit and Simon's talk?
It was a good talk and made a lot of sense.

This userspace implementation should probably renamed from wpa_supplicant
to wireless_supplicant or whatever.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help