On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:06:05PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
Martin Langer wrote:
quoted
Why not writing both (ucode rev and driver version)? Something like
"from version 4.x binary drivers (rev>0x128).\n"
BTW, if anybody needs the relationship between ucode revsion and driver
version then he should look at the table here:
http://www.langerland.de/linux/bcm43xx/firmware.html
I could do that; however, I think this error message may have a short life
as I'm just now looking at Michael's v4 firmware revisions for d80211 with
an eye toward porting them to softmac.
John - what do you think?
Let's just take the new/current patch as-is. Someone who understands
"rev > 0x128" should be able to find the message in the code for
himself... :-)
John
--
John W. Linville
linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org