Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 7 authors, 2006-09-04

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

From: Russell Stuart <hidden>
Date: 2006-09-04 10:39:11

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 07:33 -0400, jamal wrote:
quoted
Jamal - unless there are other outstanding issues I have 
missed or someone has had second thoughts this means you
should be OK with the patch going in.  Can we get it into
Dave M's tree now?
Hi Russell,

My apologies; at some point i lost track of the discussion because
things seemed under control. 
Lets hear from Patrick - I have a lot of faith in him; i just happen to
know he is occupied elsewhere as we speak (which may explain his
silence). So please be a little patient with him. In the meantime please
dont be discouraged in continuing to contribute - sometimes this is how
things go.

You are right that if there is no generic solution from Patrick we
should not hold your patch. My understanding of Patrick's patch is it
covers for your case; i may have misread that given you and him are
still discussing the differences. 

Perhaps one approach is to push your patch in first and then when
Patrick is ready he can operate on that. Patrick, thoughts?
Jamal, I think its time to assume Patrick has lost interest.
Is it possible to get this in now?


-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.542723
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help