[RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) · <hidden> · 2006-08-23
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) · <hidden> · 2006-08-28
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden> · 2006-08-28
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) · <hidden> · 2006-08-28
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden> · 2006-08-28
[RFC][PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 1/3] net/ipv4: UDP-Lite extensions · <hidden> · 2006-08-28
[RFC][PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 2/3] net/ipv4: UDP and generic UDP(-Lite) processing · <hidden> · 2006-08-28
[RFC][PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 3/3] net/ipv4: misc. support files · <hidden> · 2006-08-28
Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 3/3] net/ipv4: misc. support files · Patrick McHardy <hidden> · 2006-08-28
Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 2.6.18-rc4-mm3 3/3] net/ipv4: misc. support files · <hidden> · 2006-08-29

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] net: a lighter UDP-Lite (RFC 3828)

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-28 14:19:14
Also in: lkml

On 8/28/06, gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
|  Avoid these changes to reduce patch file size, please

I apologize for the bad patch format - I am revising the entire
patch to improve readability and will resend.

 No need for apologies and thanks for taking my suggestions into account.

- Arnaldo

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help