Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 6 authors, 2006-08-18

Re: [PATCH 1/1] network memory allocator.

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2006-08-16 09:44:38
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:40:08AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:38:37 +0100
quoted
We could, but I'd rather waste 4 bytes in struct net_device than
having such ugly warts in common code.
Why not instead have struct device store some default node value?
The node decision will be sub-optimal on non-pci but it won't crash.
Right now we don't even have the node stored in the pci_dev structure but
only arch-specific accessor functions/macros.  We could change those to
take a struct device instead and make them return -1 for everything non-pci
as we already do in architectures that don't support those helpers.  -1
means 'any node' for all common allocators.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help