Re: [PATCH 1/1] network memory allocator.
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-15 08:08:36
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-15 08:08:36
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Andrew Morton [off-list ref] writes:
There will be heaps of cacheline pingpong accessing these arrays. I'd have
though that
static struct whatever {
avl_t avl_node_id;
struct avl_node **avl_node_array;
struct list_head *avl_container_array;
struct avl_node *avl_root;
struct avl_free_list *avl_free_list_head;
spinlock_t avl_free_lock;
} __cacheline_aligned_in_smp whatevers[NR_CPUS];
would be better.Or even better per cpu data. New global/static NR_CPUS arrays should be really discouraged. -Andi