Re: [PATCH 1/6] ehea: interface to network stack
From: Jan-Bernd Themann <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-10 15:27:59
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
Hi, thanks for your comments! We'll post a modified patch very soon. Jan-Bernd Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:quoted
--- linux-2.6.18-rc4-orig/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c +++ kernel/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.cquoted
+static inline u64 get_swqe_addr(u64 tmp_addr, int addr_seg) +{ + u64 addr; + addr = tmp_addr; + return addr; +} + +static inline u64 get_rwqe_addr(u64 tmp_addr) +{ + return tmp_addr; +}The point of this exercise?
has been removed
quoted
+static inline int ehea_refill_rq3_def(struct ehea_port_res *pr, int nr_of_wqes)Way too big to be inline function.quoted
+{ + int i; + int ret = 0; + struct ehea_qp *qp; + struct ehea_rwqe *rwqe; + int skb_arr_rq3_len = pr->skb_arr_rq3_len; + struct sk_buff **skb_arr_rq3 = pr->skb_arr_rq3; + EDEB_EN(8, "pr=%p, nr_of_wqes=%d", pr, nr_of_wqes); + if (nr_of_wqes == 0) + return -EINVAL; + qp = pr->qp; + for (i = 0; i < nr_of_wqes; i++) { + int index = pr->skb_rq3_index++; + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(EHEA_MAX_PACKET_SIZE + + NET_IP_ALIGN); + + if (!skb) { + EDEB_ERR(4, "No memory for skb. Only %d rwqe filled.", + i); + ret = -ENOMEM; + break; + } + skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN); + + rwqe = ehea_get_next_rwqe(qp, 3); + pr->skb_rq3_index %= skb_arr_rq3_len; + skb_arr_rq3[index] = skb; + rwqe->wr_id = EHEA_BMASK_SET(EHEA_WR_ID_TYPE, EHEA_RWQE3_TYPE) + | EHEA_BMASK_SET(EHEA_WR_ID_INDEX, index); + rwqe->sg_list[0].l_key = ehea_get_recv_lkey(pr); + rwqe->sg_list[0].vaddr = get_rwqe_addr((u64)skb->data); + rwqe->sg_list[0].len = EHEA_MAX_PACKET_SIZE; + rwqe->data_segments = 1; + } + + /* Ring doorbell */ + iosync(); + ehea_update_rq3a(qp, i); + EDEB_EX(8, ""); + return ret; +} + + +static inline int ehea_refill_rq3(struct ehea_port_res *pr, int nr_of_wqes) +{ + return ehea_refill_rq3_def(pr, nr_of_wqes); +}ehea_refill_rq3[123] appears to be 1:1 wrappers around ehea_refill_rq3[123]_def. Any idea behind them?
introduced for near future features
quoted
+ init_attr = (struct ehea_qp_init_attr*) + kzalloc(sizeof(struct ehea_qp_init_attr), GFP_KERNEL);Useless cast.
removed
quoted
+ pr->skb_arr_sq = (struct sk_buff**)vmalloc(sizeof(struct sk_buff*) + * (max_rq_entries + 1));Useless cast
removed
quoted
+ pr->skb_arr_rq1 = (struct sk_buff**)vmalloc(sizeof(struct sk_buff*) + * (max_rq_entries + 1));quoted
+ pr->skb_arr_rq2 = (struct sk_buff**)vmalloc(sizeof(struct sk_buff*) + * (max_rq_entries + 1));quoted
+ pr->skb_arr_rq3 = (struct sk_buff**)vmalloc(sizeof(struct sk_buff*) + * (max_rq_entries + 1));quoted
+static int ehea_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd) +{ + EDEB_ERR(4, "ioctl not supported: dev=%s cmd=%d", dev->name, cmd);Then copy NULL into ->do_ioctl!
done
quoted
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP; +}quoted
+ ehea_port_cb_0 = kzalloc(H_CB_ALIGNMENT, GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!ehea_port_cb_0) { + EDEB_ERR(4, "No memory for ehea_port control block"); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto kzalloc_failed; + } + + memcpy((u8*)(&(ehea_port_cb_0->port_mac_addr)), + (u8*)&(mac_addr->sa_data[0]), 6);No casts on memcpy arguments.
done
quoted
+ memcpy((u8*)&ehea_mcl_entry->macaddr, mc_mac_addr, ETH_ALEN);quoted
+static inline void ehea_xmit2(struct sk_buff *skb, + struct net_device *dev, struct ehea_swqe *swqe, + u32 lkey) +{ + int nfrags; + unsigned short skb_protocol = skb->protocol;Useless variable. And it should be __be16, FYI.
changed
quoted
+ nfrags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; + EDEB_EN(7, "skb->nfrags=%d (0x%X)", nfrags, nfrags); + + if (skb_protocol == ETH_P_IP) {ITYM, htons(ETH_P_IP).
good point, thx
quoted
+static inline void ehea_xmit3(struct sk_buff *skb, + struct net_device *dev, struct ehea_swqe *swqe) +{ + int i; + skb_frag_t *frag; + int nfrags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; + u8 *imm_data = &swqe->u.immdata_nodesc.immediate_data[0]; + u64 skb_protocol = skb->protocol;Useless var.
removed
quoted
+ + EDEB_EN(7, ""); + if (likely(skb_protocol == ETH_P_IP)) {htons(ETH_P_IP)