Re: Linville's L2 rant... -- Re: PATCH Fix bonding active-backup behavior for VLAN interfaces
From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-01 16:48:55
From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-01 16:48:55
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:33:34AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-08 at 08:08 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
quoted
And, I think that a reconsideration of all three functions as a group could lead to better/cleaner functionality with easier support for extension (e.g. 802.1s).Agreed. I have some very strong opinions on this subject that i could share with you if you want. For example, IMO, I think it would be a lot reasonable to assume that a VLAN or VLANS are attributes of a netdevice (just like IP addresses or MAC addresses are).
I'd love to hear them. Feel free to send them off list, since I know how shy you can be... :-) John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com