Thread (180 messages) 180 messages, 22 authors, 2006-08-22

Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2006-07-09 15:08:35
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:59:42PM +0300, Pekka Enberg (penberg@cs.helsinki.fi) wrote:
On 7/9/06, Evgeniy Polyakov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+struct kevent *kevent_alloc(gfp_t mask)
+{
+       struct kevent *k;
+
+       if (kevent_cache)
+               k = kmem_cache_alloc(kevent_cache, mask);
+       else
+               k = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kevent), mask);
+
+       return k;
+}
What's this for? Why would kevent_cache be NULL? Note that you can use
kmem_cache_zalloc() for fixed size allocations that need to be zeroed.
It can work without cache at all, i.e. if cache creation fails.
Well, it can be removed of course, since it does not hurt anything.
On 7/9/06, Evgeniy Polyakov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+
+void kevent_free(struct kevent *k)
+{
+       memset(k, 0xab, sizeof(struct kevent));
Why is slab poisoning not sufficient?
Since that pointer is always known to be poisoned no matter if kernel
debugging option is turned on or off.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help