On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:48:13AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B wrote:
In article [ref] (at Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:54:25 +0400), Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] says:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B wrote:
quoted
In article [ref] (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] says:
quoted
@@ -3271,22 +3277,22 @@ int unregister_netdevice(struct net_devi
/* And unlink it from device chain. */
for (dp = &dev_base; (d = *dp) != NULL; dp = &d->next) {
Why not for_each_netdev?
it's a different list
Sorry, I still do not understand.
In other words, why will we still have dev->next?
After introducing net_device->dev_list, we do not need
dev->next anymore, do we?
dev->next is removed in the last patch, to make possible the bisection
of patch list.