Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2006-07-10

Re: [patch 1/7] net_device list cleanup: core

From: Andrey Savochkin <hidden>
Date: 2006-07-10 06:53:07

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:48:13AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B wrote:
In article [ref] (at Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:54:25 +0400), Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] says:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:34:34PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@?(B wrote:
quoted
In article [ref] (at Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:18:51 +0400), Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] says:
quoted
@@ -3271,22 +3277,22 @@ int unregister_netdevice(struct net_devi
 
 	/* And unlink it from device chain. */
 	for (dp = &dev_base; (d = *dp) != NULL; dp = &d->next) {
Why not for_each_netdev?
it's a different list
Sorry, I still do not understand.
In other words, why will we still have dev->next?
After introducing net_device->dev_list, we do not need
dev->next anymore, do we?
dev->next is removed in the last patch, to make possible the bisection
of patch list.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help