Re: Network namespaces a path to mergable code.

Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] writes:

Hi Eric,

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

quoted

Andrey Savochkin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short
patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit
function parameters and using implicit current context.
Then people can compare them and vote.
Do you think it's worth the effort?

Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it
is worth the effort to resolve this.

Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch?
Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket
namespaces basing on your code? :)

I'm not terribly afraid.  I can always say you did it wrong. :)

I don't think I am going to have time today.  But since this conversation
is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details.  
I will try and find some time.

Eric