On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the
only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator
patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process.
So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on
the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with
them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue.
Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the
validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem
submission rules.
Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However,
it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that
they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then
I apologise for missing it :)
(the #ifdef LOCKDEP should probably be converted to some sort of
lockdep_split_lock_key(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock) op - i'll do that
later)
Cool.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt