From: Sridhar Samudrala <redacted>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:38:17 -0700
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 10:50 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted
Sridhar Samudrala [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
What about using the same fields (rqueue/wqueue) as you did for /proc?
I meant extending tcp_info structure to add new fields. I think the user
space also uses this structure.
What about putting it into inet_idiag_msg.idiag_[rw]queue instead?
OK. I was under the mistaken assumption that [rw]queue fields are exported
via tcp_info. This makes it pretty simple to support netlink users also.
Here is the updated patch.
This looks fine. Applied, thanks a lot Sridhar.