Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2006-03-10 07:18:09
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2006-03-07 · Re: Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation · Shirley Ma <hidden>
- 2006-03-06 · Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
- 2006-03-06 · Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation · "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2006-03-06 · TSO and IPoIB performance degradation · Michael S. Tsirkin <hidden>
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <redacted> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:10:31 +0200
But with the change we are discussing, could an ack now be sent even sooner than we have at least two full sized segments? Or does __tcp_ack_snd_check delay until we have at least two full sized segments? David, could you explain please?
__tcp_ack_snd_check() delays until we have at least two full sized segments.