Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2006-03-10

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL

From: jamal <hidden>
Date: 2006-03-04 18:52:56
Also in: lkml

On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted
This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL.


Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <redacted>

---

This patch was already sent on:
- 12 Feb 2006
Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions
within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still
needs more testing.
Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post
what you are doing. 

What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental?
I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like
"Patrick found a bug"[1]. 
- It has been around since 2.6.7/8;
- I use it extensively on about 10 machines since (I am pretty sure a
lot more extensively than Patrick)
- I know people who use it extensively
- I am pretty sure there are people that i dont know who use it
extensively 

So on Adrian's patch and above reasoning:

ACKed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <redacted>

cheers,
jamal

[1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be
experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help