(usagi-users 03611) Re: IPv6 setsockopt software MTU patch
From: <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-19 14:54:13
From: <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-19 14:54:13
Yes, Hugo Santos suggested me to use the minimum of both, the new patch is available there : http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patch2 Thanks, Hoerdt Mickaël On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:13:44PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
In article [ref] (at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 +0100), hoerdt@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr says:quoted
The fix is very simple, it only grab the value of frag_size and use it in ip6_fragment file, could you please review the patch which fix that problem at : http://clarinet.u-strasbg.fr/~hoerdt/ip6_output.c.softfrag.patchThanks for the patch. I think even we have np->frag_size, we should consider dst_mtu(&rt->u.dst) as well. No? --yoshfuji