Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2006-01-21

Re: My vote against eepro* removal

From: Lee Revell <hidden>
Date: 2006-01-21 03:56:58
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:01 -0800, John Ronciak wrote:
There is a timer routine in the eepro100 driver which does the check
for link as well as a check for on of the hang conditions (with
work-around).  It does the check for link in a different way than
e100.  e100 uses mii call where eepro100 does it manually.  Another
difference is that eepro100 doesn't get stats unless called by the
system.  It's not in the timer routine at all.

Can we try a couple of things? 1) just comment out all the check for
link code in the e100 driver and give that a try and 2) just comment
out the update stats call and see if that works.  These seem to be the
differences and we need to know which one is causing the problem.
Heh, FWIW, Microsoft found this exact same bug with 2 different chipsets
in their latency testing (see section 4.4):

http://research.microsoft.com/~mbj/papers/tr-98-29.html

Lee
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help