Kris Katterjohn wrote:
quoted
From: Mitchell Blank Jr
quoted
(I trimmed the cc: list a bit; no need for this to be on LKML in my opinion)
I see you just added it back. Oh well.
quoted
So I guess use my patch and take "inline" off? What do you think?
Well the original author presumably thought that the fast-path of
load_pointer() was critical enough to keep inline (since it can be run many
times per packet) So they made the deliberate choice of separating it
into two functions - one inline, one non-inline.
So my personal feeling is that the code is probably fine as it stands today.
Maybe "static" should be removed, too? Oh well.
Uh, why? It's clearly a file-local function.
-Mitch