Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2005-10-25

Re: [patch 2.6.13 0/5] normalize calculations of rx_dropped

From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2005-10-24 21:58:04
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
It doesn't matter too much to me either way, but I'd like for there to
be a precisely documented definition for the various net-stats so that
I can correctly show the values to user-space (I can certainly add 
rx_discards
to rx_errors for a 'total rx errors' value, but I need to know whether
rx_discards is already in rx_errors to keep from counting things twice.)
My opinion is that:

	-- rx_errors should count all "on the wire" hardware errors;

	-- rx_missed_errors should count frames w/ no "on the wire"
	errors that cannot be received by the hardware (generally
	due to lack of DMA bufers); and,

	-- rx_discards should count frames dropped by the kernel
	after successful reception by the hardware.

I do _not_ think rx_missed_errors should be counted as part of
rx_errors, but I could be persuaded otherwise.
Jeff:  Could you lay down the law somewhere in the Documentation/
directory and then let us start fixing any driver that does it differently?
It does seem like a netdev stats clarification doc would be
appropriate.  Does anyone have the beginnings of this?

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help