Re: [patch 2.6.13 0/5] normalize calculations of rx_dropped
From: John W. Linville <hidden>
Date: 2005-10-24 21:58:04
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
It doesn't matter too much to me either way, but I'd like for there to be a precisely documented definition for the various net-stats so that I can correctly show the values to user-space (I can certainly add rx_discards to rx_errors for a 'total rx errors' value, but I need to know whether rx_discards is already in rx_errors to keep from counting things twice.)
My opinion is that: -- rx_errors should count all "on the wire" hardware errors; -- rx_missed_errors should count frames w/ no "on the wire" errors that cannot be received by the hardware (generally due to lack of DMA bufers); and, -- rx_discards should count frames dropped by the kernel after successful reception by the hardware. I do _not_ think rx_missed_errors should be counted as part of rx_errors, but I could be persuaded otherwise.
Jeff: Could you lay down the law somewhere in the Documentation/ directory and then let us start fixing any driver that does it differently?
It does seem like a netdev stats clarification doc would be appropriate. Does anyone have the beginnings of this? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com