On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:13:23PM +1000, herbert wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
quoted
but it's not the case (although the naming is not clear). So if the remote
end was the one which sent the SYN-ACK, it will clear its session. If it has
been spoofed, it will ignore the RST because in turn, the SEQ will not be
within its window.
This is what should happen:
Sorry, you're right. The SEQ check should catch this.
However, a few lines down in that same function there is a th->rst
check which will kill the connection just as effectively.
My point is that there are many ways to kill TCP connections in ways
similar to what you proposed initially so it isn't that special.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt