On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:46:46PM -0700, randy_dunlap wrote:

Agreed, the stack trace is suspicious.  (more below)

Yes, many of the oops i've collected are questionable...

This is with NAPI, right?  Would it make sense to try it with that
disabled?  (I don't recall you saying it's NAPI, but the e1000
functions seem to indicate that.)

It is NAPI, but it works fine up to 2.6.11-rc1.  2.6.11-rc2 fails,
so I'm now testing each individual -bk snapshot between them in 
hopes of finding the offending changeset.  Given that this box
is a firewall, it could be the slew of large netfilter changes
which went into -rc2, but we'll see.

and how about enabling CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER ?

It is enabled.

Phil