Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4] IPv4/IPv6: UDP Large Send Offload feature
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-06-02 23:22:04
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-06-02 23:22:04
From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <redacted> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:18:55 -0700
Since there seems to be pros and cons for both the approaches, we are planning to submit two separate patches(one for each approach). These patches also include the ethtool changes. In terms of performance, we did not observe any diff between the two approaches although the first approach(using SG) minimizes coalescing in driver.
Ok. I think minimizing driver specific work is probably going to make the SG approach more desirable, but we'll see.
Also, some changes will be required in the ethtool user-level utility. I'm not sure if this is the right forum to submit patches for the ethtool utility as well..
Making sure jgarzik@pobox.com gets the patch is usually the way to go wrt. ethtool submissions.