Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-05-21 04:28:21
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-05-21 04:28:21
From: Jeff Garzik <redacted> Subject: Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706 Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:01:23 -0400
David S.Miller wrote:quoted
From: Jeff Garzik <redacted> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:30:01 -0400quoted
Sure. What I'm driving at is that a checksum of zero seems to imply CHECKSUM_NONE not CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. tg3 only does the 0xffff check.Sure, both ways are fine.huh? They are pretty different... one says "Checksum all good, dude" and the other says "I didn't checksum, do it in software for me." right?
0x0000 is the UDP "no checksum" case, so if we say "in software" for that UDP will just let it pass through still, so the effect is that same.