Thread (73 messages) 73 messages, 14 authors, 2005-03-31

Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

From: Andrea Arcangeli <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-28 16:22:00

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:12:39PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
So in short using mempools on receiving is not needed.
I think you are assuming that there's still some atomic memory available
sometime in the future to allocate the skb for the ack, this isn't
necessairly true.

I outlined an algo that thanks to proper mempool-like reservation and
random picking of all mempool registered on a single nic, will avoid the
deadlock for receive. The less mempools there are and the bigger they
are, the faster it will recover.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help