Re: cls_u32 compile failure in current 2.6.12-rc1+BK tree
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: 2005-03-28 12:58:02
* jamal [ref] 2005-03-28 07:51
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 07:38, Thomas Graf wrote:quoted
* jamal [ref] 2005-03-28 07:24quoted
If we are going to make u32 an exception then this code should be surrounded by #ifdef ..ACTION..The same condition is needed for tcf_exts_dumpThis one seems fine even for u32, no?
Not sure what you mean, I don't want any ifdefs or actions bits in the classifiers itself anymore. Everytime we dump the actions we must be able to also dump the statistics so I think we can safely move tcf_exts_dump_stats into tcf_exts_dump and hide all dumping in that single API.