Re: IMQ again WAS(Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Andy Furniss <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-27 19:35:21
From: Andy Furniss <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-27 19:35:21
jamal wrote:
quoted
I'll have to re-run a test I did recently which was lots of tc filter matches at 8000pps - on egress IMQ was almost as good as directly on eth0. On ingress it was more than 10X worse.How many filters? I wont suspect any difference between ingress and egress.
You are right - the test was to blame. I was using my old PC as sender, it's frozen in time at 2.4.20 which for some reason has a txqueuelen on eth0 of 0. It doesn't show using netperf when just testing LAN speed - but makes alot of difference for the test I did - ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 1000 fixed it. Andy.