On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:32:31PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:23:14 +1100
Herbert Xu [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

1) The application must be able to react to MTU changes anyway.

This would seem to be the case, but keep in mind that if
we're going through all this trouble to improve this
quality of implementation issue, we should really get this
right.

Don't worry, further down in that thread we agreed that optional
SAs will simply not be added so the MTU estimate will be correct
unless it's changed by PMTU later on.
 

Anyways, in truth I'm being very picky :-)  Is there any prototype
or beginnings of these ideas anywhere?

Not yet.  However, once the MTU stuff is out of the way I would like
to work on this.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt