Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
From: Adrian Bunk <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-15 17:25:08
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2005-03-28 · Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
- 2005-03-19 · Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error · Adrian Bunk <hidden>
- 2005-03-17 · Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error · chas williams - CONTRACTOR <hidden>
- 2005-03-16 · Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error · chas williams - CONTRACTOR <hidden>
- 2005-03-16 · Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error · Adrian Bunk <hidden>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:13:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Given the #ifdef mess, perhaps bridge should have the hooks available independent of the configuration.
The problem is the other way round:
The bridge code accesses hooks in the ATM code.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed