Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2005-02-12 01:09:58
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:54:27 -0800 Rick Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
In some cases at least if the sender does not completely fill cwnd the ACKs will be delayed. And IIRC under 2.6.10 with TSO enabled, the sender does not always fill cwnd.
At a maximum, "1/tcp_tso_win_divisor" of the cwnd will ever be left empty. By default, this is 1/8 of the cwnd.