Hi,
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
In message <20050121085123.GA2471@katya>,Roman Kagan writes:
quoted
The patch is against 2.6.10. Please comment.
i guess i would prefer that entries be named typeN, like he0
instead of just a number.
you were printing 7 octets for the address.
if !CONFIG_SYSFS, then __free_atm_dev() is going to need to do the
kfree.
i added some other fields that i think are interesting.
comments?
+
+static ssize_t show_carrier(struct class_device *cdev, char *buf)
+{
+ char *pos = buf;
+ struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
+
+ pos += sprintf(pos, "%d\n",
+ adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST ? 0 : 1);
+
+ return pos - buf;
+}
Shouldn't adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_FOUND ? 1 : 0); be better : in the
case of ATM_PHY_SIG_UNKNOWN, it return 1...
Matthieu