Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
From: Russell King <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-24 11:49:07
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:03:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
I think I may be seeing something odd here, maybe a possible memory leak. The only problem I have is wondering whether I'm actually comparing like with like. Maybe some networking people can provide a hint? Below is gathered from 2.6.11-rc1. bash-2.05a# head -n2 /proc/slabinfo slabinfo - version: 2.1 # name <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab> <pagesperslab> bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 115 ip_dst_cache 759 885 256 15 1 bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 117 ip_dst_cache 770 885 256 15 1 bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 133 ip_dst_cache 775 885 256 15 1 bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 18 ip_dst_cache 664 885 256 15 1 ... bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 24 ip_dst_cache 675 885 256 15 1 bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 24 ip_dst_cache 669 885 256 15 1 I'm fairly positive when I rebooted the machine a couple of days ago, ip_dst_cache was significantly smaller for the same number of lines in /proc/net/rt_cache.
FYI, today it looks like this: bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 26 ip_dst_cache 820 1065 256 15 1 So the dst cache seems to have grown by 151 in 16 hours... I'll continue monitoring and providing updates. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core