Small patch below adds loglevels to a few printk's in net/ipv4/route.c
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <redacted>
diff -up linux-2.6.10-orig/net/ipv4/route.c linux-2.6.10/net/ipv4/route.c
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden> Date: 2004-12-29 02:00:06
Jesper Juhl wrote:
quoted hunk
Small patch below adds loglevels to a few printk's in net/ipv4/route.c
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <redacted>
diff -up linux-2.6.10-orig/net/ipv4/route.c linux-2.6.10/net/ipv4/route.c
From: Jörn Engel <hidden> Date: 2004-12-29 02:13:49
On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for completeness/correctness.
No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
hint: look for "\n"
Jörn
--
It is better to die of hunger having lived without grief and fear,
than to live with a troubled spirit amid abundance.
-- Epictetus
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Jörn Engel wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
quoted
It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for
completeness/correctness.
No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
hint: look for "\n"
hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8)
Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll
take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have
things to do).
Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have.
--
Jesper
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
Jörn Engel wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
quoted
It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for
completeness/correctness.
No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
hint: look for "\n"
hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8)
Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll
take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have
things to do).
Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have.
Ok, this is a bit embarresing. Looking at the patch now after getting some
sleep it's quite obvious that it is wrong. I should have slept on it
before sending it - sorry for the noise people.
--
Jesper Juhl
From: Herbert Poetzl <hidden> Date: 2004-12-30 02:14:39
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
Jörn Engel wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
quoted
It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for
completeness/correctness.
No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
hint: look for "\n"
hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8)
Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll
take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have
things to do).
Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have.
Ok, this is a bit embarresing. Looking at the patch now after getting some
sleep it's quite obvious that it is wrong. I should have slept on it
before sending it - sorry for the noise people.
nothing to be sorry about, and thanks for all
the work you are doing for the linux kernel ...
best,
Herbert