Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups

[2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · Adrian Bunk <hidden> · 2004-12-15
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden> · 2004-12-15
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · Adrian Bunk <hidden> · 2004-12-18
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <hidden> · 2004-12-18
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> · 2004-12-15
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · jamal <hidden> · 2004-12-15
Re: [2.6 patch] net/sched/: possible cleanups · "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> · 2004-12-28

From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Date: 2004-12-15 11:27:41

* Adrian Bunk [ref] 2004-12-15 02:27

-extern int tcf_act_police_locate(struct rtattr *rta, struct rtattr *est,struct tc_action *,int , int );
-extern int tcf_act_police_dump(struct sk_buff *, struct tc_action *, int, int);
-extern int tcf_act_police(struct sk_buff **skb, struct tc_action *a);

This looks like a police compat API for action policers but I think it's
fine, Jamal?

The other changes all make sense to me.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help