Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised)
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2004-12-02 23:01:21
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2004-12-01 · Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised) · "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
- 2004-11-19 · Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised) · Michael Vittrup Larsen <hidden>
- 2004-11-17 · [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised) · Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:52:52 -0800 "David S. Miller" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:49:30 -0800 Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
These are run on a relatively slow machine (2 way Pentium III 850Mhz) and it looks like the results are no change (in the noise).Or averaged out, about 1ms more expensive.
We could always benchmark special the loopback case since there is no risk of man-in-the-middle attacks.