Re: Minor IPSec bug + solution

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:26:13AM +0200, Martin Bouzek wrote:

quoted

quoted

function. For tunnels it returns 

tmpl->optional && !xfrm_state_addr_cmp(tmpl, x, family);

Well, I am not expierienced with the networking kernel code,
nevertheless I still think the check is not correct. 

If you change the && to ||, then an ESP tunnel SA marked as required
can be matched by a simple IPIP SA with the same addresses.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt