Re: [IPv4] Kill remnant of ip_nat_dumb
From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Date: 2004-09-23 06:19:23
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes
From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Date: 2004-09-23 06:19:23
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:14:33PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted
It's gone until someone fixes it up into working condition once more. It's been broken ever since the first bits of IPSEC dst cache infrastructure went in.Also netfilter has a static NAT too these days, so it doesn't seem to be very useful to have another one.
yes and no. From a functionality point of view: yes. From a performance point of view, there are applications for really dumb static NAT where you don't want to pull all the dependencies from ip_conntrack over ip_tables.
-Andi
-- - Harald Welte [off-list ref] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime