Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2004-09-19

Re: [PATCH] reduce stack usage in ixgb_ethtool_ioctl

From: Denis Vlasenko <hidden>
Date: 2004-09-19 18:47:28

quoted
quoted
       case ETHTOOL_GSET:{
                       struct ethtool_cmd ecmd = { ETHTOOL_GSET };
                       ixgb_ethtool_gset(adapter, &ecmd);
                       if (copy_to_user(addr, &ecmd, sizeof(ecmd)))
                               return -EFAULT;
                       return 0;
               }
       case ETHTOOL_SSET:{
                       struct ethtool_cmd ecmd;
                       if (copy_from_user(&ecmd, addr, sizeof(ecmd)))
                               return -EFAULT;
                       return ixgb_ethtool_sset(adapter, &ecmd);
               }

There will be space for _two_ ecmd's on stack.

Shall it be worked around with ugly union of structs
or we'll just wait for better gcc?
You could convert it to use ethtool_ops.
Check -mm to make sure viro hasn't already converted it to ethtool_ops...
Admit it: it's a conspiracy. Whenever I take some code to hack on, somebody
else takes care of it before I do ;)
--
vda
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help