Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 4 authors, 2004-08-09

Re: [PATCH 2.6] vlan ioctl propagation (rev.2)

From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-09 15:53:48

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 23:10:37 +0200
bert hubert [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 02:39:28PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
quoted
Here is a redo of the patch to propagate ethtool and mii ioctl's
on vlan's to the underlying real device.  This time the request
is copied to a new buffer, to avoid the colon name rewrite issues.
Is this really what we want? We also don't make virtual IPs appear as real
interfaces anymore. Virtual devices are just that - virtual.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Open source, database driven DNS Software 
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
The problem is that the bridge code (and bonding) want to be able to send ethtool
ioctl's to the device.  The bridge wants it to find out the speed of the device
to set the spanning tree values appropriately. 
I would rather not special case VLAN's.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help